نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 طلبه سطح سه، موسسه آموزش عالی حوزوی نورالزهرا(س)، زنجان، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بو علی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The verses of disavowal (Barāʾa), which were revealed in the ninth year after Hijra and proclaimed during the Hajj pilgrimage by Imam ʿAlī (AS), are among the contested verses between Shia and Salafi exegetes. Considering that al-Mīzān (from the Shia tradition) and al-Manār (from the Salafi tradition) are two influential and contemporaneous tafsīrs that have significantly shaped later interpretations—and both employ the method of interpreting the Qur’an by the Qur’an—this study examines the verses of Barāʾa from the perspectives of these two tafsīrs. The main research question explores the similarities and differences between al-Mīzān and al-Manār regarding these verses. The aim is to achieve a clearer understanding of the verses and to compare the viewpoints of these two scholars. The study adopts a comparative approach and utilizes a library-based research method.The findings indicate: 1. Both ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī and Rashīd Riḍā interpret barāʾa as distancing from anything detested or undesirable. 2. Rashīd Riḍā views the ruling of disavowal as purely legislative (tashrīʿī), whereas ʿAllāma considers it not only legislative but also a declarative judgment (ḥukm and qaḍāʾ). 3. In verse 5 of Sūrat al-Tawbah, the referents of disavowal are seen as sequential by ʿAllāma and as discretionary by Rashīd Riḍā. 4. Both Shia and Salafi traditions accept that Imam ʿAlī (AS) announced the verses of disavowal, but Shia scholars interpret the narrations of this event as proof of Imam ʿAlī’s superiority, while Salafi scholars cite the narrations but reject such an implication.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)