نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته جامعة المصطفی العالمیه
2 دانشیار پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه
3 عضو هیئت علمی جامعة المصطفی العالمیه
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract
Discussions and reviews about Tawheed Rabubi have caused differences of opinion in its branches and minor issues among commentators; Among the commentators of Al-Mizan, he believes that the revealed teachings of the Qur'an are based on the monotheism of God; But the commentator of al-Manar has dealt with theological issues as much as necessary. Therefore, the present research with the subject of "criticism and examination of the commonalities and differences of the Tawheed Raboubi in the interpretation of al-Mizan and al-Manar" with the aim of identifying and analyzing the points of commonalities and differences in the viewpoints of the two mentioned sets of interpretations in the discussion of the Tawheed Raboubi and with a descriptive-analytical method and A comparison has been made. The findings of the research show that al-Mizan and al-Manar focus on God's monotheism, its naturalness and provability with rational reasons, and also in explaining the relationship between God's monotheism and the religious principles of justice and resurrection and its relationship with valuable teachings in general. They have followed a common path. While these two interpretations in the conceptualization of the word "Lord" and its derivatives, in expressing the conceptual associations of God's Lordship with other attributes, in explaining the belief principle of prophecy such as the scope of the prophet's mission, the power of the prophets to control their affairs and miracles, they have presented different opinions.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)